On Sun, 2006-10-15 at 21:19 -0500, Alan M. Feldstein wrote: > > I agree that the vast majority of Axis2 use cases would enjoy the > convenience of a single jar, but consider the fact that the Java > language lacks unsigned types. The principle of reuse teaches use to > go find existing classes. Providing ADB separately encourages this > reuse. This way, you provide something useful to the broader Java > community, not just Web services. When you have created something that > is generally useful, I say that it should be kept separate.
I think you have a point .. ADB is now a generic XML Schema <-> Java mapping, whether we like it or not and it can be used in cases outside of Axis2 and Web services. At some point we should consider moving that code out to a util/common project to make it clear. Sanjiva. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
