[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-1603?page=comments#action_12450606 ] 
            
Rich Scheuerle commented on AXIS2-1603:
---------------------------------------

Summary :
  1) Added alternate implementations for the doc/lit and doc/lit wrapped method 
marshallers.
   2) Added an rpc/lit marshaller implementation.
   3) Added toggles to enable either the old or new marshallers.  The new 
marshallers will be enabled by this patch.
   4) Added toggles to enable the old marshallers on the client and the new 
marshallers on the server (or vice versa) .  I ran all of the jaxws tests with 
the mismatched marshaller implementations to verify that I did not break 
anything.
    5) The 3 new marshallers (rpc/lit, doc/lit bare and doc/lit wrapped) have a 
smaller code footprint than the 
         2 old marshallers.  I added extensive comments to the new marshaller 
implementations.
    6) Streamlined and made some changes to the JAXBWrapperTool
    7) Added more trace information to the jaxws layer.

I did not add any tests.  I will open another jira for the test effort.





> Add RPC/Lit MethodMarshaller support
> ------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: AXIS2-1603
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-1603
>             Project: Apache Axis 2.0 (Axis2)
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: jaxws
>            Reporter: Nick Gallardo
>         Assigned To: Rich Scheuerle
>         Attachments: patch1.txt, patch_rpc.txt
>
>
> With Rich's RPC updates to the JAX-WS Message model, we now need the 
> MethodMarshaller support to go along with that.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to