Sanjiva Weerawarana wrote:
On Mon, 2007-02-12 at 13:32 +1300, Dennis Sosnoski wrote:
I'd personally support changing the message receiver interface to add a
ping() method, with the AbstractMessageReceiver class implementing it as
discussed. The reason is that I see this as something that should be a
mandatory part of the framework.
If we add the method then I'd prefer to have a module that supports the
features we've discussed but not always engaged. The reason is that this
is a non-standard feature and so its something we should encourage
people to engage (globally) but not require. Are you ok with that?
Sure, on consideration I think a module is the right way to go.
- Dennis
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
