Hi Dims,

I'd actually started on it last week, but didn't make as much progress as 
I'd hoped.

When is the freeze date for the 1.2 release? 

Thanks,

Nicholas Gallardo
WebSphere  -  WebServices Development
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Phone: 512-838-1182
Building: 901 / 5G-016



"Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
02/17/2007 03:39 PM
Please respond to
[email protected]


To
[email protected]
cc

Subject
[Axis2] AXIS2-2155 - Re: JAXWSMessageReciever Marshaller Problem






Rich, Nick,

Any idea if we can fix this for 1.2 release?

thanks,
dims

On 2/9/07, Nicholas L Gallardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dims,
>
> By "the other SOAP engine", I'm assuming that's CXF?
>
> Our usage of JAXB right now is dependent upon root elements.  By that, I 
mean that the wrapper bean that's defined as the root element in the 
schema.  These generated classes carry some additional annotations that 
allow us to unmarshall them easily with JAXB.
>
> I discussed this with Rich and he had some ideas about ways we could 
possibly get around this.  It will have to be a lower severity item though 
as we're working through some functional scenarios.  I've opened a JIRA 
issue to track this.
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-2155
>
> Regards,
>
> Nicholas Gallardo
>  WebSphere  -  WebServices Development
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Phone: 512-838-1182
>  Building: 901 / 5G-016
>
>
>
>  "Davanum Srinivas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> 02/09/2007 10:54 AM
>
> Please respond to
>  [email protected]
>
>
> To [email protected]
>
> cc
>
>
> Subject Re: JAXWSMessageReciever Marshaller Problem
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Nick,
>
>  The other soap engine inside Geronimo seems to work w/o needing the
>  wrapper classes. Anything we can do to get ours working too? w/o
>  having to run the xjc command with "-wsdl"? Is this planned, or out of
>  scope?
>
>  thanks,
>  dims
>
>  On 2/9/07, Nicholas L Gallardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>  >
>  > Hi Lasantha,
>  >
>  > Sorry for the late response here.  You have correctly identified the 
missing piece though.  For services that are considered doc/lit wrapped 
(the default for JAX-WS), it is required that the wrapper beans  be 
generated.  You can get these by running the JAXB generation tool with the 
"-wsdl" flag I believe.  The JAX-WS runtime in Axis2 will not generate 
these on the fly, but needs these classes to be able to 
marshall/unmarshall the messages.
>  >
>  > Beyond that though, you don't need to include the @RequestWrapper or 
@ResponseWrapper annotations if the generated class names follow the 
defaults:
>  >
>  >      - package name is the same as the SEI
>  >      - class names are OperationName and OperationNameResponse with 
the appropriate camel casing.
>  >
>  > Hope that helps...
>  >
>  > Regards,
>  >
>  > Nicholas Gallardo
>  >  WebSphere  -  WebServices Development
>  >  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  Phone: 512-838-1182
>  >  Building: 901 / 5G-016
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  "Lasantha Ranaweera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >
>  > 02/05/2007 09:54 AM
>  >
>  >
>  > Please respond to
>  >  [email protected]
>  >
>  >
>  > To [email protected]
>  >
>  > cc
>  >
>  >
>  > Subject RE: JAXWSMessageReciever Marshaller Problem
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > Hi Nick,
>  >
>  >  Thank you very much for the giving some insight.
>  >
>  >  Say for example if are having Doc/Lit service with @ResponsWrapper &
>  >  @RequestWrapper annotations, will the Axis2 generate intermediate 
classes
>  >  for the JAXB binding automatically? Otherwise do we need to some how
>  >  generate it & add it in to the archive?
>  >
>  >  First we are working on an example which has a WSDL and creating
>  >  annotations by hand using it's relevant composites.
>  >
>  >  Please find the attached WSDL, endpoint & endpoint impl class.
>  >
>  >  Any help would be greately appriciated.
>  >
>  >  Thanks,
>  >  Lasantha Ranaweera
>  >  > Lin,
>  >  >
>  >  > JAXB objects are not always required.  You could be using simple 
types
>  >  > that map base Java types like String, int, boolean, etc.  But, in 
all
>  >  > cases, we will use JAX-WS as a means to marshall/unmarshall data 
types.
>  >  >
>  >  > The exception you're seeing usually happens when the JAXBContext 
that is
>  >  > used to unmarshall the message is not configured correctly.  The 
two
>  >  > messages that you see from JAXBUtils could be an indication of the 
problem
>  >  > depending on what pattern your service is following (wrapped vs. 
bare).
>  >  > I'm guessing wrapped since it went down into the
>  >  > DocLitWrappedMethodMarshaller.
>  >  >
>  >  > Overall, we need one of two things to be able to configure the 
JAXBContext
>  >  > correctly and unmarshall the incoming request.
>  >  >
>  >  > a) If it's wrapped, then you need to have an @RequestWrapper and
>  >  > @ResponseWrapper annotation on your operation.  That can be used 
by JAXB
>  >  > to pick-up the wrapper classes that are defined for that 
operation.
>  >  >
>  >  > b) If it's not wrapped, then you will need to have an 
ObjectFactory.  The
>  >  > ObjectFactory can be used by the JAXBContext under the covers to 
figure
>  >  > out how to unmarshall elements that don't have custom types 
defined.
>  >  > Without this though, the unmarhaller wont' work.
>  >  >
>  >  > Can you post an example of the endpoint that you're trying to 
deploy and
>  >  > what annotations it has on it?  Is this endpoint being deployed 
with or
>  >  > without a WSDL?
>  >  >
>  >  > Regards,
>  >  >
>  >  > Nicholas Gallardo
>  >  > WebSphere  -  WebServices Development
>  >  > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  > Phone: 512-838-1182
>  >  > Building: 901 / 5G-016
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  > "Lin Sun" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  >  > 02/04/2007 09:50 PM
>  >  > Please respond to
>  >  > [email protected]
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  > To
>  >  > <[email protected]>
>  >  > cc
>  >  >
>  >  > Subject
>  >  > RE: JAXWSMessageReciever Marshaller Problem
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  > Hi there,
>  >  >
>  >  > A basic question, are jaxb objects required in a simple hello 
jax-ws
>  >  > application?   I think I am running the same test as Lasantha and 
this
>  >  > test
>  >  > doesn't have any jaxb generated classes in the war file.  Axis2 
did choose
>  >  > to use DocLitWrappedMethodMarshaller to do the marshaller work and 
the
>  >  > following exception was thrown when message.getBodyBlock(0, 
blockContext,
>  >  > factory) is called.
>  >  >
>  >  > javax.xml.bind.UnmarshalException
>  >  >  - with linked exception:
>  >  > [javax.xml.bind.UnmarshalException: unexpected element
>  >  > (uri:"http://apache.org/hello_world_soap_http";, local:"greetMe"). 
Expected
>  >  > elements are (none)]
>  >  >
>  >  > I also saw
>  >  >
>  >  > 21:50:34,781 INFO  [JAXBUtils] ObjectFactory Class Not Found
>  >  > 21:50:34,828 INFO  [JAXBUtils] package-info Class Not Found
>  >  >
>  >  > in my console log, which seems to indicate that axis2 requires the
>  >  > existence
>  >  > of the ObjectFactory Class and package-info Class (part of jaxb 
generated
>  >  > classes) in the test application?
>  >  >
>  >  > This same jax-ws test works with CXF integration into Geronimo so 
I
>  >  > thought
>  >  > it would be okay to not have jaxb objects in the application 
archive.
>  >  > However, missing it seems to cause the UnmarshalException.
>  >  >
>  >  > Any help is appreciated.
>  >  >
>  >  > Lin
>  >  >
>  >  > -----Original Message-----
>  >  > From: Lasantha Ranaweera [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  > Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 1:33 AM
>  >  > To: [email protected]
>  >  > Subject: Re: JAXWSMessageReciever Marshaller Problem
>  >  >
>  >  > Hi Nich,
>  >  >
>  >  > Thank you very much for the information. I have uploaded latest 
patch
>  >  > (number 2) to the Geronimo list under GERONIMO-2776.
>  >  >
>  >  > I am basically trying to read a WSDL and  create JAXWS service by 
hand
>  >  > filling necessary composites for situations where class level
>  >  > annotations are not provided.
>  >  >
>  >  > After some debugging sessions understand this is due to the 
missing JAXB
>  >  > objects in my application archive. It would be ideal if you can 
explain
>  >  > me how the JAXB bindings work for the JAXWS in the Axis2 side. :-)
>  >  >
>  >  > Also is there any publicly available articles to refer JAXWS stuff 
on
>  >  > the Axis2?
>  >  >
>  >  > Thanks Again,
>  >  > Lasantha
>  >  >
>  >  > Nicholas L Gallardo wrote:
>  >  >>
>  >  >> Hi Lasantha,
>  >  >>
>  >  >> Sorry for the delayed response here.
>  >  >>
>  >  >> I think I need to understand how you're deploying/configuring the
>  >  >> endpoint before I can provide guidance on what's going on here. I
>  >  >> know we've already started the Geronimo integration, but I think 
some
>  >  >> of that is going to (or should probably) rely on similar work 
that
>  >  >> needs to be done in Axis2.  Do you have some information or
>  >  >> architecture that you can share for how this is being done?
>  >  >>
>  >  >> As far as this situation, the unmarshalling is going to be 
predicated
>  >  >> on what style of WSDL you have.  If you've just annotated a POJO 
and
>  >  >> then deployed that, the default WSDL mapping is to a 
Document/Literal
>  >  >> Wrapped style WSDL.  You can use the SOAPBinding annotation as 
you've
>  >  >> already seen to toggle between a Document and RPC style.  Only
>  >  >> "literal" use is supported.  JAX-WS does not support RPC/Encoded 
style
>  >  >> WSDLs.
>  >  >>
>  >  >> At a high level what will happen is, after the request comes in 
to the
>  >  >> JAXWSMessageReceiver, a decision will be made as to what
>  >  >> MethodMarshaller needs to be loaded.  This decision is based on 
the
>  >  >> information in the EndpointDescription/OperationDescription. Each 
of
>  >  >> those objects is a view of the WSDL and annotation information
>  >  >> available for an endpoint/operation.  If those are not configured
>  >  >> correctly, then you won't have the right MethodMarshaller.
>  >  >>
>  >  >> Is the scenario that you have intended to truly be based on an 
"RPC"
>  >  >> style WSDL (as opposed to a "Document" style)?  I'm assuming that 
the
>  >  >> RPC in the RPCMessageReceiver is referring more to the fact that 
it's
>  >  >> for services that are based on an interaction that people would
>  >  >> consider RPC over a messaging style interaction.  Is that 
correct?
>  >  >>
>  >  >> Regards,
>  >  >>
>  >  >> Nicholas Gallardo
>  >  >> WebSphere  -  WebServices Development
>  >  >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >> Phone: 512-838-1182
>  >  >> Building: 901 / 5G-016
>  >  >>
>  >  >>
>  >  >> *"Lasantha Ranaweera" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>*
>  >  >>
>  >  >> 01/26/2007 11:09 PM
>  >  >> Please respond to
>  >  >> [email protected]
>  >  >>
>  >  >>
>  >  >>
>  >  >> To
>  >  >>                [email protected]
>  >  >> cc
>  >  >>                [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >> Subject
>  >  >>                JAXWSMessageReciever Marshaller Problem
>  >  >>
>  >  >>
>  >  >>
>  >  >>
>  >  >>
>  >  >>
>  >  >>
>  >  >>
>  >  >>
>  >  >> Hi,
>  >  >>
>  >  >> This is a problem arised in the Geronimo Axis2 integration with
>  >  >> JAXWSMessageReciever.
>  >  >>
>  >  >> I created an AxisService with a JAXWSMessageReciever as it's 
message
>  >  >> reciever and trying to invoke the service using
>  >  >> HTTPTransportUtils.processHTTPPostRequest() method. We are 
sending a RPC
>  >  >> based SOAPRequest to the service invocation.
>  >  >>
>  >  >> The JAXWSMessageReciever then creates Marshaller for the 
unmarshall
>  >  >> requests. This marshaller creation is entirely depends on the
>  >  >> EndpointInterfaceDescriptionImpl SOAPBinding style. By default it
>  >  > creates
>  >  >> a DocLiteralMarashaller and tries to unmarshall my RPC based 
request and
>  >  >> get failed with UnmarshallException :(. When I change the default
>  >  >> SOAPBinding style in EndpointInterfaceDescriptionImpl to RPC it 
works
>  >  > fine
>  >  >> (sure it's not the way to do it). Is this is the correct 
behaviour of
>  >  >> Marshal creation of JAXWSMessageReciever? Shouldn't it be depends 
on
>  >  >> SOAPMessage messaging mode too?
>  >  >>
>  >  >> BTW I have created a JIRA (AXIS2-2044) patch to remove some of 
the
>  >  >> misleading information gives in the Axis2 integrating it with 
Geronimo.
>  >  >>
>  >  >> Thanks,
>  >  >> Lasantha Ranaweera
>  >  >>
>  >  >> 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >>
>  >  >>
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  > 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  > 
---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  >  >
>  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  >  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >  --=_alternative 005A88328625727D_=--
>  > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  >
>  >
>
>
>
>  --
>  Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services 
Developers
>
>  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>



-- 
Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to