[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-2651?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12492916
]
Bjorn Townsend commented on AXIS-2651:
--------------------------------------
Can you provide a test case or other materials for reproducing this issue? It
would make it easier to fix.
> elementFormDefault="unqualified" and <element ref="xxx"/> lead to incorrect
> soap requests
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AXIS-2651
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-2651
> Project: Axis
> Issue Type: Bug
> Affects Versions: 1.4
> Environment: any
> Reporter: Roland Scheel
>
> When an element within an enclosing element is declared via
> <element ref="prefix:type/>
> in an xsd file with the elementFormDefault attribute set to "unqualified" the
> resulting xml element node should contain the element's namespace prefix.
> Only those prefixes of inline declared element (non-ref-Elements) should be
> omitted.
> The implementation generates soap requests that do not validate against the
> xsd-schema because it is omitting the prefix in both cases.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
