-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I have no objection to this but is there something you will gain by doing this or rather is there a problem if we leave them as it is? This is some what similar to the question Sanjiva was asking and had become the theme for me when I am doing any change to Axis2. If something is not broken, why bother trying to fix it and create probably un-necessary trouble.
The reason I am telling like that is, we are getting hammered for ClassNotFoundExceptions and MethodNotFoundExceptions in the users list. Simply we do too much of refactoring. Most users are now familiar with some internals of Axis2 and not only those few public APIs. I am repeating my self, I have no objection to this, but just wanted to give some ideas before any refactoring :) Chinthaka Davanum Srinivas wrote: > Team, > > Anyone object to moving the following classes to > org.apache.axis2.dispatchers? > > AddressingBasedDispatcher.java > HTTPLocationBasedDispatcher.java > InstanceDispatcher.java > RequestURIBasedDispatcher.java > RequestURIOperationDispatcher.java > SOAPActionBasedDispatcher.java > SOAPMessageBodyBasedDispatcher.java > > Leaving AbstractDispatcher.java as-is in org.apache.axis2.engine > > thanks, > dims > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFGfwFPjON2uBzUhh8RAp1YAJ0Q4daijAUeCOYuRpm8EcSxZNCj3gCgo/B5 6R03kK0JHrZgS1zcQ86txxE= =hzF6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
