Not sure if this is related but in Geronimo trunk is generally
working towards some goal and eventually get's there (like where
we're almost at with 2.0 w00t being fully compliant).
I know in G there are a number of things people want to work on for
2.1 that will be destabilizing and as sich trunk (at least for us)
many not be stable or safe as new development will be going on.
Sounds like this is what Rich was assuming. Dims, sounds like trunk
is going to be meandering on in 1.3.x somewhat stable mode?
On Jul 11, 2007, at 9:23 PM, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
Yep. Please check everything into trunk.
thanks,
dims
On 7/11/07, Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Rich!
> We are not working on anything experimental or controversial.
All of
> our changes
> (at this point) are to push JAX-WS towards CTS compliance. The
changes
+1
> outside of jaxws and metadata modules
> are (IMHO) minor changes and bug fixes. We are not changing
APIS. We
> would like to get all of this work
> into RC2...but we don't want to hold up RC2 for our changes.
Having a
> branch when RC2 is cut is only necessary so
> that we can continue work and have these fixes for the 7/20 (per
Matt's
> note).
OK, but again, I'm a little confused. The branch itself doesn't
matter
because you're going to be checking these changes into the trunk,
right?
--Glen
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Davanum Srinivas :: http://davanum.wordpress.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
