Hi Jeff:

Thanks for the proposal.  A couple of comments:

First and foremost - this approach seems far too heavyweight to me. It feels a lot simpler and more natural to simply register understood QNames with AxisOperation/AxisService, much as you were doing before. Why is the validator technique better?

Second, re: actors/roles. As I mentioned before, we already have a mechanism to iterate through only the headers that are for the roles we're playing. By default we process only those headers for the ultimate destination and the "next" roles. All you need to do to change that is create an org.apache.axiom.soap.RolePlayer object which returns the supported "non-standard" roles and answers whether or not it is the ultimate destination. What we need to do is provide an API/config mechanism for setting up roles. I'd propose something like an addRole(String) API on AxisConfiguration and AxisService, and also perhaps a setUltimateDestination(boolean) in those same places to enable intermediary services that do NOT process ultimate destination headers. AxisModule would want addRole() as well, and the code that constructs the RolePlayer would need to take into account the roles for any engaged Modules. The equivalent config in either axis2.xml or services.xml would be something like:

  <isUltimateDestination>false</isUltimateDestination>
  <roles>
   <role>http://my-funky-role</role>
  </roles>

So in short, I'd vastly prefer a simple QName registration API rather than callouts to new components, and I think we need to finish designing the actor/role configuration.

Thoughts?

--Glen

Jeff Barrett wrote:
Goals
=====

1. Pluggable and extensible via configuration. Allow higher-level, non-engine components to participate in mustUnderstand validation. Examples include JAX-WS runtime and appliction handlers, WS-RM, and systems using Axis2 as a bus.

2. Support for actors/roles. Only mustUnderstand headers for actors/roles in which this node acts should be checked. Note that actors/roles would not be implemented immediately, but future support is taken into consideration in the design.
OVERVIEW
========

A list of soapHeaderValidators can optionally be configured in axis2.xml. The list of validators will be stored on the AxisConfiguration. Each validator has a method which takes a collection of not-yet-understood header QNames, a collection of String roles, and a MessageContext. The method will return a collection of header QNames based on the input parameter which are still not understood; that is, it removes any that it understands from the list. The AxisEngine.checkMustUnderstand() method will invoke each validator, passing in the collection of still-not-understood headers. If, after all the validators are called the collection is not empty, a mustUnderstand fault is thrown. The logic would be something like:

String[] rolesActedIn = ... // list of actors/roles acted in. QName[] notUnderstoodHeaders = ... // list of all mU headers not marked as processed SOAPHeaderValidator[] validators = axisConfig.getSoapHeaderValidators();
        for (SOAPHeaderValidator validator : validators) {
notUnderstoodHeaders = validator.validate(notUnderstoodHeaders, rolesActedIn, messageContext)
        }
// If there are any not-understood headers after running the validators
        // throw an exception
        if (notUnderstoodHeader.length != 0) {
            throw notUnderstoodException
        }

There is no API for the registration of understood headers; each validator is responsible for deciding what it understands and removing it from the collection. For example, the JAXWS validator would look for a property (which it set earlier) on the AxisOperation containing the QNames for any JAXWS SEI header parameters and any headers understood by JAXWS application handlers. That property would be set by JAXWS on the AxisOperation during application startup.
Configuration in axis2.xml
--------------------------

The <soapHeaderValidators> element is optional. If ommited then all mustUnderstand headers must be marked as processed by handlers, or a mustUnderstand fault will be thown (i.e. current AxisEngine.checkMustUnderstand semantics are unchanged)
<soapHeaderValidators>
<soapHeaderValidator>org.apache.axis2.jaxws.JAXWSSoapHeaderValidator</soapHeaderValidator> <soapHeaderValidator>my.other.validator.MySOAPHeaderValidator</soapHeaderValidator>
</soapHeaderValidators>



Thanks,
Jeff

IBM Software Group - WebSphere Web Services Development
Phone: 512-838-4587 or Tie Line 678-4587
Internet e-mail and Sametime ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to