My apologies for not chipping in last week. I have serious reservations about these changes, not least that I disagree with the basic statement: "So whether we run addressing before or after the security the behavior will be the same ." I'll follow up on this in the other thread I've started. David
On 26/07/07, Amila Suriarachchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 7/26/07, Deepal Jayasinghe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > I did some integration tests using Rampart, Sandesha and Addressing. > > > for both http and smtp transports. > > > All those senarios successed with the latest Axis2 and Sandesha builds > > > with the attached Axis2.xml and Sandesha module.xml. (Chamikara helped > > > me a lot in doing this.) > > > Same tests successed with an .Net service using http transport as well. > > > > > > Therefore I belive this phase order is the most correct one to use > > > with full stack. > > > > > > Here we have used a new phase called > > > <phase name="SandeshaGlobalHandlerPhase" /> > > Nope we do not need this phase , and I think we can get the same > > behavior by putting the handler in the Dispatch phase. > > if you are quite sure no problem. > > > Thanks > > Deepal > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > -- > Amila Suriarachchi, > WSO2 Inc. -- David Illsley - IBM Web Services Development --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
