David, I don't know if Axiom will work with the Geronimo StAX api jar. I can test it with Woden, but the decision will rest with the Axiom/Axis2 devs. If Axiom shipped that jar instead of codehaus it would solve the problem.
John Kaputin. On 8/22/07, David Illsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > John, > If the geronimo stax-api 1.0 is compatible with the codehaus stax-api > 1.0.1 then I can't se why we couldn't swap the one used by Axiom... do > you know if Axiom will work with the geronimo jar? > David > > On 21/08/07, John Kaputin (gmail) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Axis2 and Axiom redistribute the stax-api-1.0.1.jar file from the > Codehaus > > StAX project under the Apache License 2.0, however it is not initially > > distributed under this license. The jar file does not contain a license > > file and the only reference to licensing on the StAX project website > > ( stax.codehaus.org) is "Open Source (Apache ASL 2.1)", but ASL 2.1 does > not > > exist. > > > > Does anyone know how the decision was reached in Apache to redistribute > > this jar file under AL 2.0? Or where else I should direct this question > to? > > > > My question is motivated by Apache Woden release management and > incubation > > exit criteria. Woden uses Axiom so it also redistributes the > > stax-api-1.0.1.jar file, but I can't find any basis for the AL 2.0license > > used by Axiom for the stax jar. We've had suggestions previously to use > the > > Geronimo StAX API jar instead, but we really need to maintain the > correct > > Axiom dependencies, so we need to answer this question. > > > > thanks, > > John Kaputin. > > > > > -- > David Illsley - IBM Web Services Development > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
