On 12/27/07, David Illsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Glen, > It's just as well I saw you volunteering and didn't do it as well, > 'cos I was tempted :-)
:) So that is why I implement that :) > > +1 to your more advanced options in general terms. > > Do you have a defined behaviour when multiple modules define phases > with the same name, or with the same name as a statically defined > phase? Presumably the first/static declaration wins and you trace out > the multiple declaration failure? In my implementation if two modules try to add the same phase then th fist win. -Deepal --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
