On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I don't think that we should AUTOMATICALLY grant access to every Synapse/CXF > (or Axis2 for that matter, into the future) committer, no. But I do think
+1 > the barrier to entry for those folks should be a lot lower (pretty much if > they ask - but I do think there should be a formal separation). Yeah ... if someone really needs to do a lot of work on these .... we can handle those appropriately at that point right? Otherwise anyway our usual way of getting changes in still works! Thanks, Ruchith > > What do you think? > > --Glen > > Davanum Srinivas wrote: >> >> So, should all synapse and cxf folks have access to all these >> projects? What say you? >> >> -- dims >> >> On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Glen Daniels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >>> >>> Daniel Kulp wrote: >>>> >>>> On Monday 03 November 2008 10:14:30 am Davanum Srinivas wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Glen, >>>>> >>>>> Was looking at >>>>> http://wiki.apache.org/ws/FrontPage/Proposals/Axis2TLPProposal >>>>> >>>>> Any thoughts on why leave behind XmlSchema, Neethi, Axiom? >>>> >>>> Because they are used by several other projects that have nothing to do >>>> with Axis 2? >>> >>> Exactly. I do NOT think (re: the other thread) that Axiom should be a >>> TLP, >>> and I do think that all of these libraries make sense as "Web Services" >>> components with a shared committer-base working on them. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> --Glen >>> >> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -- http://blog.ruchith.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
