[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-4071?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12749848#action_12749848
]
Boris Milanov commented on AXIS2-4071:
--------------------------------------
Hi,
We are also experiencing problems with the duplicate elements.
Is there any chance that this JIRA will be fixed soon?
> WSDL11ToAxisServiceBuilder + RPC/Literal OR HTTP binding =~ Inconsistent
> XMLSchema object: duplicated global element declarations
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AXIS2-4071
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-4071
> Project: Axis 2.0 (Axis2)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: kernel
> Affects Versions: 1.4, nightly
> Environment: Windows XP. 4GB RAM Intel Xeon dual-core @2.75Ghz
> Reporter: Antonio Andrade
> Attachments: AXIS2-4071.patch, JUnit Tests - Before.jpg
>
> Original Estimate: 72h
> Remaining Estimate: 72h
>
> In WSDL11ToAxisServiceBuilder:
> 1) Within the 'setup()' method, a map ('schemaMap') indexed by
> targetNamespace and values equal root (W3C) Elements is populated
> 2) When either a RPC/Literal binding or an HTTP binding with message parts
> referencing type definitions is found, new global element declarations based
> on the WSDL operation name are created. These new elements can either be
> added to an existing (W3C) Document (in case the 'schemMap' contains a
> document with the same target namespace as the one that the newly created
> element has) or added to a newly created Document.:
> a) If a new document is created, an additional namespace mapping
> declaration is added to that document (see 'XMLNS_AXIS2WRAPPED' ). This helps
> distinguishing this document among the other original ones.
> b) If an additional document is NOT created, the new global element
> declarations are added to an existing document. No additional namespace
> mapping declaration is added.
> 3) After all wrapped elements have been created, XmlSchema objects are
> created from the original, modified and newly created W3C Documents
> Note that all this leads to duplicate global element declarations any time
> there's already an element named after an operation name. This is very common
> and happens every time operation names across multiple bindings are the same.
> In general, all this is caused by the creation of XML schema elements while
> transforming operations using the RPC/Literal encoding style into the
> Document/Literal encoding style using the wrapped convention.
> There is more than one problem associated with the creation of new XML global
> element declarations:
> 1) First of all, the XML schema documents end up with duplicated global
> element declarations which makes the Schema invalid. But why nobody seems to
> have noticed it? I think it's just a coincidence, let me explain: A XmlSchema
> object maintains a MAP, indexed by element name (QName) and XmlSchemaElement
> objects as values. This map is used for a faster object retrieval. At the
> same time, the XmlSchema object also maintains a LIST of all nodes
> (XmlSchemaObject objects I think). So whenever duplicate elements are added
> to the schema, the last-inserted elements overwrite the previous elements on
> the MAP of elements but they are inserted with no problems in the LIST of
> nodes and because the latter elements are usually what people is looking for
> (i.e. in case of databinding libraries that create the client stub for a
> single port), the 'correct' element is returned
> 2) If the Definition object (from WSDL4J) is used to populate multiple
> AxisServices from different WSDL ports, for example, within the
> 'WSDL11ToAllAxisServicesBuilder' (which, by the way doesn't seem to work at
> all), the W3C Schema Document may end up with multiple duplicated global
> element declarations and the 'AxisService.getSchemaElement(QName)' method
> will fail to return the appropriate reference.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
