Hi all:

I'm currently seeing some build failures with Rampart and 1.5.1, which I'd
like to resolve before actually putting this out. :(

4350 does also seem pretty serious, and it's clearly a regression, so I'm
good with fixing that in 1.5.1 as well.

As such, I'm going to try and look into these items and re-spin the release
next week.  Argh.  Sorry for the inconvenience.

Thanks,
--Glen

Pétur Runólfsson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> May I suggest that http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-4350 be fixed 
> before the release?
> 
> The effect of this bug is that web services that use ADB and use a wsdl 
> provided by the user (not generated on the server) simply don't work at all. 
> The fix is simple, and can be found in a comment on the issue.
> 
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-4471 seems to be a duplicate of 
> this bug.
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Pétur Runólfsson
> ________________________________________
> From: Glen Daniels [[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 13:36
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] [axis2] Release Axis2 1.5.1 (take 2)
> 
> Ping!  Please VOTE... or comment?
> 
> --G
> 
> Glen Daniels wrote:
>> Hi Axis Developers,
>>
>> After fixing the documentation and a few other small issues since the last
>> attempt at 1.5.1, I think we're ready to try again.  I've also addressed the
>> "forced build of Axiom" issue with the CLOSE_WAIT fix - we now by default
>> clean up the last operation context each time we build a new one inside
>> ServiceClient.
>>
>> While there may still be a few things we need to address (still waiting for
>> transports / Rampart / Sandesha for instance), I think it's important to get
>> this out ASAP since there were clearly some serious issues with 1.5 -
>> including the failed JavaDoc build and the persistent CLOSE_WAIT issues that
>> are fixed in 1.5.1.
>>
>> As a reminder, fixes include:
>>
>>     *  Fix for the dreaded "CLOSE_WAIT" problem (JIRA issues 935, 2883, etc).
>> We now share an instance of HTTPClient across each ConfigurationContext (i.e.
>> each Axis2 server or ServiceClient) - connection reuse is now automatic. This
>> means the REUSE_HTTP_CLIENT flag is no longer necessary or useful, nor is
>> creating your own MultithreadedHttpConnectionManager.
>>     * Transport deployer is now actually functional, and getListenerManager()
>> in ConfigurationContext now creates a new LM if there isn't one already.
>>     * Fix for AXIS2-4034, module versions now support real versions like 
>> "1.5.1"
>>     * NPE problem (see AXIS2-4114) fixed in MessageContext while retrieving
>> policy.
>>     * Fix for JavaDoc build problem.
>>
>> I'd like to kick off a VOTE for the release, with the usual 72-hour window
>> for votes.
>>
>> You can find the distribution files in here:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~gdaniels/stagingRepo/org/apache/axis2/distribution/1.5.1/
>>
>> And the M2 repository with everything is at:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~gdaniels/stagingRepo
>>
>> The SVN tag is:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/webservices/axis2/tags/java/v1.5.1RC2
>>
>> ...and I'll add a proper "v1.5.1" tag as soon as this release goes final.
>>
>> Please offer your VOTE (and indicate binding/non-binding).
>>
>> Here's my +1 (binding).
>>
>> Many thanks,
>> --Glen
>>
> 
> The content of this e-mail, together with any of its attachments, is for the 
> exclusive and confidential use of the named addressee(s) and it may contain 
> legally privileged and confidential information and/or copyrighted material. 
> Any other distribution, use or reproduction without the sender's prior 
> consent is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have by coincidence, 
> mistake or without specific authorization received this e-mail in error, 
> please notify the sender by e-mail immediately, uphold strict confidentiality 
> and neither read, copy, transfer, disseminate, disclose nor otherwise make 
> use of its content in any way and delete the material from your computer.
> 
> The content of the e-mail and its attachments is the liability of the 
> individual sender, if it does not relate to the affairs of Betware.
> Betware does not assume any civil or criminal liability should the e-mail or 
> it´s attachments be virus infected.

Reply via email to