[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-4583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aaron Witt updated AXIS2-4583:
------------------------------
Attachment: screenshot-1.jpg
this is me trying to generate the code off of the wsdl. as you can see, it
does not succeed. i have tried to use vasious flags, but to no avail
> axis2 wsdl2java - more than one part for message
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: AXIS2-4583
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-4583
> Project: Axis 2.0 (Axis2)
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: wsdl
> Environment: Windows XP SP3, Eclipse Java EE IDE for Web Developers,
> JBoss 4.0
> Reporter: Aaron Witt
> Attachments: screenshot-1.jpg
>
> Original Estimate: 2h
> Remaining Estimate: 2h
>
> I am trying to generate code off of a WSDL
> (https://thefinder.tax.ohio.gov/OHFinderService/OHFinderService.asmx?WSDL)
> using the wsdl2java utility provided in the Axis2 v1.5.1 jar. Whenever I try
> this, regardless of the different switches that can be used, I get the error,
> "more than one part for message GetOHSalesTaxByAddressSoapIn." I've done a
> fair amount of researching on the issue, and, obviously, there is something
> not spec about this WSDL. However, this being the Ohio Department of
> Taxation's WSDL, I am not getting much of a response from them on the issue,
> and, assuming this is fairly widely used throughout Ohio, at least, most
> people must be working fine with this WSDL as it stands. Another interesting
> note is that using .NET or axis (the first one, specifically 1.4), I am able
> to generate the code from this WSDL. I cannot use axis1, though, because our
> production system is using quite a few axis2 jars, and we have experienced
> nothing but jar hell trying to get those two to mix in our production
> environment. Does anyone out there have an idea as to why I am getting this
> error? Is there something I can do to correct their WSDL while still abiding
> by the original communication contract? Or perhaps there is a switch of
> which I'm unaware that will be less stringent about generating code off of a
> WSDL? I know that you people are going to be helping me, so I don't mean to
> sound petulant here (and I preemptively apologize if I do sound that way),
> but this is a time-sensitive matter for me, so the quicker the help, the
> better. Thanks.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
