I have a question. You've listed the tests that you will be excluding. Could you also give us an idea of the bugs that will be fixed so we know what to expect when we start running the new TCK?
Thanks.
Russell Butek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Re: [Fwd: jaxrpc issues]
We are tentatively targeting mid next week for releasing the patch for jaxrpc and for saaj.
We will be excluding:
jaxrpc/api/javax_xml_rpc/Serivce/Client.java#GerPortsPosTest2_from_standalone, bug 4708354
saaj/api/javax_xml_soap/AttachmentPart/URLClient.java#getSize3Test_from_standalone, bug� 4712878
saaj/api/javax_xml_soap/Node/URLClient.java#getValueTest1_from_standalone, bug 4712829
Regards,
Lance
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here is the latest chart describing the TCK Issues and failing tests.
(See attached file: TCKIssues.html)
Russell is working on the attachments test.
I am about ready to commit a change to Java2WSDL to support multi-ports, multi-services, multi-portTypes etc.
Eagerly awaiting the new JAXRPC TCK
Rich 'Shirley' Scheuerle
IBM WebSphere & Axis Web Services Development
512-838-5115 (IBM TL 678-5115)
[IMAGE]Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| [IMAGE] |
Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 07/15/2002 09:37 PM Please respond to axis-tck |
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: Subject: [Fwd: jaxrpc issues] |
Rich, Russell - what's the outlook for more issues?
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: jaxrpc issues
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2002 13:37:49 -0400
From: Lance Andersen
To: Sam Ruby , Davanum Srinivas
Hi Sam, Dims,
I saw Rich's email regarding your jaxrpc issues. Outside of the doc/lit
issue which needs to be worked via Rahul from a spec perspective, is
there any other outstanding issues that might be coming my way? I am
trying to get the work wrapped up on the jaxrpc patch so this info would
be helpful.
Dims, can you please answer the same question regarding SAAJ?
Regards,
Lance
--
Lance Andersen email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sun Microsystems Inc. phone: (781) 442-2037
1 Network Drive, UBUR02-301 fax : (781) 442-1610
Burlington, MA 01803
TCKIssues�
|
|
|
GetPortsPosTest2� |
Note: Axis was changed to pass this test |
|
SetGetPropertyTest1_from_standalone(passes but w/ Stub issue) |
|
|
setPropertyTest5_from_standalone |
|
|
AttachmentsTest_from_standalone |
|
|
inheritedinterfaceTest_from_standalone |
|
|
MarshallStandardJavaClassesTest_from_standalone |
|
|
MarshallJavaBeanTest_from_standalone |
|
|
MarshallValueTypeTest_from_standalone |
|
|
MarshallJavaArrayTest_from_standalone |
|
|
MarshallJavaMultiArrayTest_from_standalone |
|
|
MarshallServiceExceptionTest_from_standalone |
|
|
MarshallSimpleTypesTest_from_standalone |
| |
MarshallArraysOfSimpleTypesTest_from_standalone |
| |
SimpleTest_from_standalone |
| |
invokeStockQuoteService_from_standalone |
| |
MarshallAllSimpleXMLDataTypeTest_from_standalone |
(Some of the marshal tests also have issues 2 and 11, but they are hidden by 7) |
(TCK bug #4708425 assigned, TCK bug #4714327 assigned) |
MarshallAllStructsTest_from_standalone |
|
|
MarshallSequenceStructsTest_from_standalone |
|
|
MarshallWSDLRestrictedArrayTest_from_standalone |
|
|
MarshallSOAPRestrictedArrayTest_from_standalone |
|
|
MarshallExceptionsTest_from_standalone |
|
|
MarshallEnumerationsTest_from_standalone |
|
|
MarshallAllSimpleXMLDataTypesTest_from_standalone |
|
|
InSimpleTypesTest_from_standalone |
|
|
OutSimpleTypesTest_from_standalone |
|
|
InOutSimpleTypesTest_from_standalone |
|
|
InStructTest_from_standalone |
|
|
JavaKeywordsTest_from_standalone |
7. Full bean constructor issue |
TCK bug #4708351 assigned |
JavaNamingConventionsTest_from_standalone |
7. Full bean constructor issue |
TCK bug #4708351 assigned |
Issue Explanations
Issue: 2 Boolean value
The TCK expects getVarBooloon instead of isVarBoolean for a bean property that is a boolean value.
Issue: 3 get<port> xml name
TCK expect getxMLNameMappingTestService method on the service and Axis has getXMLNameMappingTestService.
Sun doesn't see a problem.� We may need to change Axis to comply.� (Note the WSDL port name is xMLNameMappingTestService.) Rich Scheuerle is investigating.
Issue: 4 getPorts() problem
TCK expects a call to getPorts() to return a null iterator if there is no wsdl.� The specification clearly indicates that an exception should be thrown.� Axis was changed to comply with the TCK.� The Axis change should be backed out once the TCK is fixed.
Issue: 5. Roundtrip Issues
Problems with roundtripping Calendar/Date.
Issue: 6 Wrapped Doc/Lit
The TCK and Axis do not agree on the way to interpret wrapped doc/lit.
�
Issue: 7 Full Bean Constructor
The TCK relies on full constructors in the beans, which is not compliant with the specification.
�
Issue: 8 Stub/Call Get/Set Property Issue
The TCK expects an exception when it sets/gets an unknown property.� AXIS does not throw an exception.
�
Issue: 11 Calendar Issue
The compareCalendars method in the TCK should compare the canonical form of the calendars.
�
Issue: 12 Client.class is stale
The Client.class file for the inherited interface test does not match the Client.java.� Recompiling Client.java fixes the problem.
�
--
Lance Andersen email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Sun Microsystems Inc. phone: (781) 442-2037
1 Network Drive, UBUR02-301 fax : (781) 442-1610
Burlington, MA 01803
<<inline: ecblank.gif>>
<<inline: C6003675.gif>>
<<inline: C8699170.gif>>
<<inline: C9128097.gif>>
<<inline: C8450799.gif>>
