That would refer to a local definition of a type called anyType, it
probably should be referencing the XML schema type anyType, e.g.
<s:complexType name="ArrayOfAnyType">
<s:sequence>
<s:element minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" name="item"
type="s:anyType" nillable="true" />
</s:sequence>
</s:complexType>
Cheers
Simon
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, April 13, 2005 5:11 PM
> To: axis-user@ws.apache.org
> Subject: Re: NULL Pointer exception in BeanDeserializer
>
> I'm a little leary of this definition in the schema:
>
> <s:complexType name="ArrayOfAnyType">
> <s:sequence>
> <s:element minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded" name="anyType"
> nillable="true" />
> </s:sequence>
> </s:complexType>
>
> This defines an *element* named "anyType" (rather than a
> *type* named "anyType"), which I suspect could cause a lot of
> confusion.
>
> I would suggest changing it to
>
> <s:complexType name="ArrayOfAnyType">
> <s:sequence>
> <s:element minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="unbounded"
> name="item" type="anyType"
> nillable="true" />
> </s:sequence>
> </s:complexType>
>
> Anne
>
> On 4/13/05, Ramesh Vijayaraghavan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Also, please note that his looks like an array within an
> array, Array
> > of variables enclosing an Array of anytype. Is this WSDL
> definition corrrect?
> > Thanks,
> >
> >
>
>
