I am attempting to
use Axis2 with some fairly complex (large, lots of includes/imports, etc) schema
and working through a few problems. While working through these issues I tend to
iterate over the different versions of Axis (0.9 to M2) to understand if I am
seeing consistent behavior (particularly for M2) and to see if different
versions shed more light on a given problem.
One difference
between the 0.9 and M2 versions I have noticed is in the generation of
stub/skeletons when using WSDL2Java. With M2 the data bindings don't seem to be
generated automatically for you while in 0.9x they seem to be and I was hoping
someone would have some insight into this issue. In particular an answer to the
question if the direction of Axis2 is not to auto generate the data binding
stubs, but instead allow the developer to use XmlBeans to generate the data
bindings and then use those behind the default skeletons? This seems like a
logical direction, but I was curious if it was an official
direction.
cheers
