Thanks, I neglected to mention that I had tried that, and it didn't help. Anne Thomas Manes said: > Try using the -w or --wrapArrays option on WSDL2Java and see if that > helps. > > Anne > > On 1/24/06, Wes Munsil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Does anyone have a clue about what to do about this? I'm seeing what >> looks >> like the same problem. Axis 1.3 WSDL2Java is generating int instead of >> ArrayOfint. Also happens with arrays of complex types. >> >> WSDL has this: >> >> <types> >> <xsd:schema xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"; >> targetNamespace="urn:top"> >> <xsd:complexType name="ArrayOfint"> >> <xsd:complexContent> >> <xsd:restriction base="SOAP-ENC:Array"> >> <xsd:attribute ref="SOAP-ENC:arrayType" >> wsdl:arrayType="xsd:int[]"/> >> </xsd:restriction> >> </xsd:complexContent> >> </xsd:complexType> >> <xsd:complexType name="Context"> >> <xsd:sequence> >> <xsd:element name="ErrorCode" type="tns:ArrayOfint"/> >> </xsd:sequence> >> </xsd:complexType> >> </xsd:schema> >> </types> >> >> WSDL2Java generates this: >> >> static { >> typeDesc.setXmlType(new javax.xml.namespace.QName("urn:top", >> "Context")); >> org.apache.axis.description.ElementDesc elemField = new >> org.apache.axis.description.ElementDesc(); >> elemField.setFieldName("errorCode"); >> elemField.setXmlName(new javax.xml.namespace.QName("", >> "ErrorCode")); >> elemField.setXmlType(new >> javax.xml.namespace.QName("http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";, >> "int")); >> elemField.setNillable(false); >> typeDesc.addFieldDesc(elemField); >> } >> >> Original message: >> ================> >> Hi iksrazal! >> I must admit I'm not an expert but: >> Comparing the Java-files produced with 1.1RC2 with those produced with >> newer releases there seems to be one relevant difference: >> >> 1.1RC2 sets the XmlType in the following way: >> elemField.setXmlType(new javax.xml.namespace.QName("http://...";, >> "ArrayOfY")); >> typeDesc.addFieldDesc(elemField); >> >> the newer ones do it like this: >> elemField.setXmlType(new javax.xml.namespace.QName("http://...";, "Y")); >> typeDesc.addFieldDesc(elemField); >> >> So the prefix "ArrayOf" is missing. If I add "ArrayOf" manually to the >> generated code everything works great. So I think it is not a schema >> question. >> Thanx, >> Grmlfz >> >> > --- Urspr�ngliche Nachricht --- >> > Von: iksrazal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > An: axis-user@ws.apache.org >> > Betreff: Re: Problem serializing array of complex types >> > Datum: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 16:26:13 -0200 >> > >> > Grmlfz, >> > >> > I'm not understanding your problem. I've used those evil soapenc >> > arrays quite a bit. What's does or doesn't it do? Your wsdl files are >> > the same always, right ? What you show different is seemingly schema >> > stuff, which doesn't have anything to do with wsdl2java. >> > >> > Try clarifying your question a bit. (Maybe its the holidays and I'm >> > not thinking clearly yet). What result stays the same? From where? >> > >> > iksrazal >> > http://www.braziloutsource.com/ >> > >> > Em Quinta 29 Dezembro 2005 16:01, o [EMAIL PROTECTED] escreveu: >> > > Hi! >> > > I'm using WSDL2Java to generate Java-files from a customers >> WSDL-files. >> > > These WSDL-files use complex types containing arrays of other >> > > complex types. Till now we used 1.1RC2 to generate the Java-files. >> > > This worked >> > well >> > > serializing the array to somthing like this: >> > > >> > > <X soapenc:arrayType="ns2:Y[2]" xmlns:ns2="..." >> > xmlns:soapenc="..."> >> > > <item> >> > > <ADR_TYP>M</ADR_TYP> >> > > <ADRESSEN_EXTRA xsi:nil="true"/> >> > > </item> >> > > <item> >> > > <ADR_TYP>M</ADR_TYP> >> > > <ADRESSEN_EXTRA xsi:nil="true"/> >> > > </item> >> > > </X> >> > > >> > > Now I tried the same with Axis 1.2 and 1.3 and got somthing like >> > > that >> > > >> > > <X> >> > > <ADR_TYP>M</ADR_TYP> >> > > <ADRESSEN_EXTRA xsi:nil="true"/> >> > > </X> >> > > <X> >> > > <ADR_TYP>M</ADR_TYP> >> > > <ADRESSEN_EXTRA xsi:nil="true"/> >> > > </X> >> > > >> > > The WSDL in both cases is the same. I think I've tried each >> > > available switch, but the result stays the same. >> > > >> > > Is this a bug or what am I doing wrong? >> > > >> > > Thanks in advance, >> > > Grmlfz >> > >> > -- >> > >> >> -- >> DSL-Aktion wegen gro�er Nachfrage bis 28.2.2006 >> verl�ngert: >> GMX DSL-Flatrate 1 Jahr kostenlos* http://www.gmx.net/de/go/dsl >> >> >
