+1

On 2/27/06, Ajith Ranabahu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all,
I also opposed the idea of a seperate mailing list sometime back but I
have to admit that there's a whole lot of folks interested in Axis2
right now which seems to be making the lists crowded (primarily by
forgetting the axis2 prefix). If the Apache infra has no problem I
would say we should go for a seperate list.

Ajith

On 2/27/06, Srinath Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:
> +1, when we first started I oppose this becouse we need Axis 1
> developer and users to look at Axis2 and to give feedback. But I think
> now it is good time to move to a seperate list .. taking one more step
> closer to 1.0
>
> Srinath
>
> On 2/26/06, Jim Azeltine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I would like to propose once again to create a seperate list for Axis 2. I
> > realize that it makes it so developers have two lists to deal with, but I
> > believe it would be better. The focus of the two efforts is really very
> > different, bug resolution and stability for Axis 1, new product development
> > for 2.
> >
> > Jim
> >
> >
> > Eran Chinthaka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I see increasing traffic on issues regarding Axis2. This mail is just a
> > reminder to pass the mails to the correct people.
> >
> > As you all can see we use the same mailing list to address the issues
> > related to both Axis 1.x and Axis2. So we came up with a small
> > convention to distinguish between those two.
> > Please put the prefix "[Axis2]" in to the subjects of all your mails to
> > Axis2. This way you have a better chance of getting a good and early
> > reply from axis2 team.
> >
> > This is even mentioned in our site as well.
> >
> > Thanks,

> > Chinthaka
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> ============================
> Srinath Perera:
>    http://www.cs.indiana.edu/~hperera/
>    http://www.bloglines.com/blog/hemapani
>


--
Ajith Ranabahu

Reply via email to