Hello Dies, Do you mean I "should" use either the -p or -n option?
In that case, does the -p option implicitly set the name space to the second argument? -p <package> <target namespace> Am I understanding you to say I should not need the -n argument to specify my namespace if it's done "implicitly" by the -p option? Many thanks.. Varta --- Dies Koper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Vartan, > > I think one usually uses either -p or -n, I'm not sure how they work > together (which mappings take priority). But as you map them to the > same > namespace anyway, I cannot imagine it would cause problems. > What kind of problems do you see with the endpoint calls that do not > work? > > Regards, > Dies > > Rhimbo wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Can you please help me clear up my confusion? I am trying to > > generate a WSDL for my code. I'm thoroughly confused. > > > > I issued the following command: > > > > $ java org.apache.axis.wsdl.Java2WSDL -o family.wsdl \ > > -l"http://localhost:8080/axis/services/familyAccounts"; \ > > -n urn:familyAccounts \ > > -p"disney.dis.family" urn:familyAccounts \ > > disney.dis.family.Family > > > > - My Java package is disney.dis.family. > > > > - My Java interface is Family, defined in Family.java. > > > > - The implementation class is FamilyImpl, defined in > > FamilyImpl.java. > > > > My namespace can be anything I guess, but I chose "familyAccounts". > > > > Is this correct? I got a few of the service end point calls to > > work, but some don't and I cannot figure out the problem. > > > > My understanding is that the arguments mean this: > > > > -namespace <target namespace> > > -PkgtoNS <package> <namespace> > > > > > > Here's the strange part. Previously, I confused the meaning of the > > arguments. I reversed the <package> and <namespace> parameters as > > follows: > > > > > > $ java org.apache.axis.wsdl.Java2WSDL -o family.wsdl \ > > -l"http://localhost:8080/axis/services/familyAccounts"; \ > > -n urn:familyAccounts \ > > -p"familyAccounts" urn:disney.dis.family \ > > disney.dis.family.Family > > > > I know that sounds funny, but my service worked as well then as > > it does now. That's why I'm so confused now! > > > > Many thanks, > > > > Vartan > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
