Hello Ali, I'm sure Anne is correct! I can't comment because I haven't used WS-Addressing yet. :-)
I'll just share what I did. Hope I understood your design problem. I defined a "register" port name. Clients must call this and give me an "application name", a "session identifier" and a URL. These are all specific to our apps. I register the URL. When I want to notify that client, I call him back on the URL he registered. I defined the web service. Clients must implement it. So I know what port name to call, what arguments to pass. The only thing is that arbitrary clients can set the URL to be the service end point on which they publish the service that I'll call in the call back. I'm sure WS-Addressing is a better way to do it. :-) Something I need to learn! Vartan --- Anne Thomas Manes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > WS-Addressing. > > On 4/27/06, Ali Sadik Kumlali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi all, > > > > I want to send a notification message to my clients when their > requests > > are processed and the results are ready. Then I expect them to call a > > service to acquire the results. Here is the sample scenario: > > > > server.wsdl > > ------------ > > - OpenAccount > > - input: OpenAccountMsg > > > > - GetOpenAccountResult > > - input: GetOpenAccountResultMsg > > - output: GetOpenAccountResultResponseMsg > > > > client.wsdl > > ------------ > > - ResultIsReady (input only) > > - input: ResultIsReadyMsg > > > > > > OpenAccountMsg (MessageId: A) > > Client -----------------------------------------------------> Server > > > > > > ResultIsReadyMsg (MessageId: B, RelatesTo: A) > > Client <----------------------------------------------------- Server > > > > > > GetOpenAccountResultMsg (MessageId: C, RelatesTo: A) > > Client -----------------------------------------------------> Server > > <----------------------------------------------------- > > GetOpenAccountResultResponseMsg (MessageId: D, RelatesTo: A) > > > > > > Here are the questions: > > 1) Do you see any flaw in this scenario? Or is there a common and > > standards based way to accomplish this kind of asynchronous > > communication? > > > > 2) I haven't found a good way to say my clients which service do they > > need to call for getting the results. I'm planning to put the name of > > result service name (GetOpenAccountResultMsg) in notification message > > (ResultIsReadyMsg). > > > > Could you please enlighten me? Any help would be great! > > > > Ali Sadik Kumlali > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > > Do You Yahoo!? > > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > > http://mail.yahoo.com > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
