Hi Tom,

There are some options more or less "practical" to get what you want.

One is to replace your domain class with the generated one. This will probably mean moving the "non-bean" functionality in your domain Customer to another class, maybe something like "CustomerHelper". Of course, this is not always possible, as you may have some internal fields in your domain class you want to keep there.

Another option is to make your domain class to subclass the generated class, or include it as an internal field.

Copying does not have to be so bad. If you have a fixed mapping between what you have in your domain classes and what you want to return as XML beans, you can implement the copying in a helper class. This will reduce the probability of an error. If you use the same names for your bean attributes in both classes, commons-beanutils maybe of help, as it provides some methods to perform "conversions" between bean classes.


My own experience tells me that using the same object for internal and XML binding purposes is not always a good idea. If your service modifies the state of your domain objects, using them for serialization will probably result in incoherences in your returned data.

Think about it. If you return your Customer, Axis 2 starts deserializing it to build the response, and in another request somebody changes some fields in the same object, the response may contain inconsistent data. Take into account that, once you "release" your object to Axis, you loose control over the transactionality of any operation on that instance.

I am not saying this is the end of the world. This scenario might not be possible in your services, or even if possible, it may have little or no importance. But if you do need returned data to be consistent, copying field values into an XML bean may be the only way to get a valid snapshot of your data.


Hope this helps,
Rodrigo Ruiz


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Hi,

I'm struggling a bit with the following.

Say, I have a web service that allows you to search for customers. It accepts a customer name, and returns a set (any number) of customers. The response xml may look like

<customerSearchResponse>
        <customer>
                <number>123</number>
                <name>John Doe</name>
        </customer>
        <customer>
                <number>987</number>
<name>Jane Doe</name> </customer>
</customerSearchResponse>

Obviously, in my application I have a Customer class. Now if I create a wsdl for this web service, and generate the server side code for it, one of the classes that is generated is a customer class, that represents the customer in the xml response. On the other hand, I have the Customer domain object, which is a different one. To generate the response, I have to create 'xml response' customers, and basically copy the information from the Customer class to it. The above example is very simple, but you can imagine more complexe cases that would involve a lot of copying from domain objects to xml representation objects. This is very tedious and error-prone work -- typically work that I would like to avoid.

Is there an elegant way to solve this issue?


Thanks,
Tom


------------------------------------------------------------------------

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.7.4/351 - Release Date: 29/05/2006

--
-------------------------------------------------------------------
GRIDSYSTEMS                    Rodrigo Ruiz Aguayo
Parc Bit - Son Espanyol
07120 Palma de Mallorca        mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Baleares - EspaƱa              Tel:+34-971435085 Fax:+34-971435082
http://www.gridsystems.com
-------------------------------------------------------------------


--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.7.4/351 - Release Date: 29/05/2006


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to