Good catch. -----Original Message----- From: Ian Brown [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 3:51 PM To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: RE: schema vs. xsd:schema
Not to be a pedant, but I'm correcting a minor typo in Simon's response so Jarmo does not get confused: On 7/11/06, Simon Fell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It depends on whether the schema namespace has been made the default > namespace or not. > <schema xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> > <element name="foo" /> > </schema> > > Is equivilent to > <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"> > <xsd:element name="foo" /> > </xsd:schema> Cheers, - Ian --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]