This e-mail communication and any attachments may contain confidential and
privileged information for the use of the
designated recipients named above.
If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have
received
this communication in error and that any review, disclosure,
dissemination, distribution or copying of it or its
contents
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, October 24, 2006 10:25
AM
Subject: [Axis1.4] MinOccurs is ignored
with string types?
Hi all,
I have a WSDL file with a schema definition like this:
<xs:complexType
name="Professional">
<xs:sequence>
<xs:element
name="name" type="Name" />
<xs:element
name="contact" type="ContactData" minOccurs="0" />
<xs:element name="qualification"
type="Qualification" />
<xs:element
name="additionalQualification" type="Qualification" minOccurs="0"
/>
<xs:element name="organizationName"
type="xs:string" minOccurs="0" />
</xs:sequence>
</xs:complexType>
Now when I generate Axis stubs with this definition I will get the
following code in Professional.java:
typeDesc.setXmlType(new javax.xml.namespace.QName("http://bpm.icw.com/regservices/v1-0-0/domain
",
"Professional"));
org.apache.axis.description.ElementDesc elemField = new
org.apache.axis.description.ElementDesc();
elemField.setFieldName
("organizationName");
elemField.setXmlName(new javax.xml.namespace.QName("http://bpm.icw.com/regservices/v1-0-0/domain
",
"organizationName"));
elemField.setXmlType(new javax.xml.namespace.QName("
http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema",
"string"));
elemField.setNillable(false);
typeDesc.addFieldDesc(elemField);
elemField = new org.apache.axis.description.ElementDesc();
// ...
As you can see the MinOccurs command is completely ignored on the
organization element. On the other optional complex types this is not a
problem, though. I adjusted the MinOccurs to 5 and the MaxOccurs to 7, and
even then no (min/max)Occurs property setting was present in the generated
code.
So now I think that maybe Axis has a problem with simple types like
String when it comes to generate code with occurrency information. Can anyone
confirm this, maybe? Or tell me what I'm doing wrong? Or - best of all :-) -
give me a workaround?
Greetings & thanks in advance,
Axel.
