Good analysis of this topic here: http://www.oreillynet.com/xml/blog/2004/02/mom_wsrel_and_wire_protocol_in.htm l
My thoughts: * WS-RM is about interoperability, which has no guarantee in JMS (no standard wire format) * A JMS server is likely to be faster (no XML parsing) * Most JMS implementations, like ActiveMQ, are likely to be more mature * WS-RM is mostly focused on message acknowledgement, ordering, and dealing with duplicates, but doesn't provide other QoS guarantees (e.g. durability) * WS-RM is good for bridging different types of messaging systems (i.e., the two technologies are not necessarily exclusive...) It all depends on your requirements... Brennan Spies Sr. Programmer Analyst Shared Application Services -----Original Message----- From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 3:52 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Axis2] RM module vs. ActiveMQ WSRM with DB persistence provides comparable capability to ActiveMQ. Anne On 10/26/06, falom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > If i use reliable messaging module with DB persistence for my axis2 service, > do i still have reason to consider using activeMQ? > > falom > > > ________________________________ > 抢注雅虎免费邮箱-3.5G容量，20M附件！ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
