Hello,
I think that by default should be generated all ports for all services.
And with option you may choose which ports for wich services will be generated.
Thanks,
Alexey
On 6/28/07, Amila Suriarachchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
hi all,
currently wsdl2java generate stubs for all the ports in all the services
unless user has restricted to generate the code for a particular service or
a particular port. As a result of this generated stub names are long and it
seems a lot of people don't happy with this.
For this problem paul has suggested a solution in [1].
For an example lets say we have two services like this,
<service name="Service1">
<port name="Port1" binding="Soap12"/>
<port name="Port2" binding="Soap11"/>
</service>
<service name="Service2">
<port name="Port1" binding="Soap12"/>
<port name="Port2" binding="Soap11"/>
</service>
for this currently we have
Service1Port1Stub.java
Service1Port2Stub.java
Service2Port1Stub.java
Service2Port2Stub.java
And the new proposal suggest to generate only
Service1Stub.java --> for Port1 in Service1
Service2Stub.java --> for Port1 in Service2
(here I assume it is reasonable to generate a Stub for each service although
it is not explicitly specified in the proposal)
the priority order for pick a port within the service is depends on the
ports binding type.
the order is Soap12, Soap11 and http.
And give a seperate -all option to generate code as in now if user requried.
Please comment on this. If someone dose not oppose I'll go ahead and do this
change.
thanks,
Amila.
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS2-2831
--
Amila Suriarachchi,
WSO2 Inc.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
