Yes, I didn't show it, but my classes did have getters/setters, default public constructor, and basically obeyed the rules of a JavaBean. Dave
________________________________ From: Deepal Jayasinghe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Fri 2/29/2008 1:01 AM To: axis-user@ws.apache.org Subject: Re: Nested return types from POJO web service method -shouldn't this work? > I have defined a POJO service which has a method which returns an > object which contains fields that are nested non-simple objects. > > > > So given the *Pojo* class which implements *ReturnInfoObject*, the > *InfoObj* object being returned contains a field *nest* which is > defined by the *NestedObj* object. > > > > *public class Pojo* > > *{* > > * public InfoObj ReturnInfoObject()* > > * {* > > * ...* > > * }* > > *}* > > * * > > * * > > *public class InfoObj* > > *{* > > * **private** java.lang.String val;* > > * private NestedObj nest;* > > *}* > > * * > > *public class NestedObj* > > *{* > > * private** java.lang.String nestedVal;* > > *}* > > > > When my client calls the deployed *Pojo* service, the *val* field of > *InfoObj* shows up in the soap trace, but the *nest* field is empty, > even when it has been correctly allocated on the service side. > Nope this can not be happen , however you need to remember that you class should be JavaBean (need to have getters and settes). I have tested this and working fine , in addition to that following link will be helpful for you to understand about Axis2 POJO. http://www.developer.com/java/other/article.php/10936_3726461_3 Thank you Deepal --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<<winmail.dat>>
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
