STUDS!!

-----Original Message-----
From: R J Scheuerle Jr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 3:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: xsd:byte??? (fixed)


This performance bug has been fixed.

Rich Scheuerle
XML & Web Services Development
512-838-5115  (IBM TL 678-5115)



                      R J Scheuerle
                      Jr/Austin/IBM@IBM        To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                      US                       cc:
                                               Subject:  Re: xsd:byte???
                      02/25/2002 04:24
                      PM
                      Please respond to
                      axis-user





I'll look into this if you send me your wsdl file describing  the service.

Thanks,

Rich Scheuerle
XML & Web Services Development
512-838-5115  (IBM TL 678-5115)



                      "Adam Freeman"

                      <afreeman@lightsu        To:
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
                      rf.com>                  cc:

                                               Subject:  xsd:byte???

                      02/25/2002 03:53

                      PM

                      Please respond to

                      axis-user






Hello,
I am trying to send over an array of bytes to an axis service.  I was
running out of memory and took a look at what was getting sent over the
wire and it looks like every single byte in the byte[] that is being sent
over is being marshalled as an xsd:byte type.  Is this a performance hit, a
joke or what??  Is this supposed to be an improvement over base 64
encoding/decoding?

<item xsi:type="xsd:byte">0</item>
    <item xsi:type="xsd:byte">0</item>
    <item xsi:type="xsd:byte">1</item>
    <item xsi:type="xsd:byte">-84</item>
    <item xsi:type="xsd:byte">0</item>
    <item xsi:type="xsd:byte">0</item>
    <item xsi:type="xsd:byte">0</item>
    <item xsi:type="xsd:byte">20</item>

HUH???  (Please reply to this address because I am no longer on the axis
user mailing list.)
- Adam






Reply via email to