Yes, that would be the expected behavior. -- Oliver
Scott Seely wrote: > > For the exception, I assume that the expected behavior in .NET is > something like this: > > 1. Import fault type > 2. Derive fault type from SoapException > 3. Allow catch to be as specific as the "fault" or as generic as > Exception. > > As for the throws declaration, didn't C++ beat Java to the idea? ;) > 'course, the implementation is a wee bit different. > > As for why C# doesn't have the throws declaration, I think I remember > seeing a discussion on why on the dotnet list hosted at > discuss.develop.com. > > Anyhow I think I've ranged far enough off topic now. Sorry for the > diversion. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Oliver Suciu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 1:30 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: .Net ignores <wsdl:fault>? > > Yes, but wsdl.exe doesn't generate the exception classes, so I > can't catch an exception more specific than SoapException. > > It actually doesn't matter cuz I don't even get exceptions > propagated properly to an Axis client -- looks like the > current state of the art is not ready yet for <fault>... > > -- Oliver > > PS: Just found out that C# has no equivalent to the Java > "throws" declaration -- interesting... > > Scott Seely wrote: > > > > At this point in time, what .NET will do is receive the data and make > it > > visible to the client code as XML through the details element (IIRC). > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Oliver Suciu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, April 19, 2002 10:49 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: .Net ignores <wsdl:fault>? > > > > Hi all, > > > > (Sorry, this one is somewhat geared towards .Net...) > > > > I've got an Axis service that throws an exception, and WSDL2Java > > correctly generates a <wsdl:fault> for the <wsdl:operation>. > > > > However, the .Net wsdl.exe seems to completely ignore the <fault>, > > and no corresponding client-side code is generated. > > > > Has anybdoy got this working? > > Anybdoy looked into .Net interop with respect to <fault>? > > > > Thanks, > > > > -- Oliver
