Hi,
I think I found a bug in the Bean Mapping when inheritance is used. The
Java bean TestResult is descendant of TestAbstractResult:
-----------
public class TestAbstractResult
{
private String someInfo;
public String getSomeInfo()
{
return someInfo;
}
public void setSomeInfo(String someInfo)
{
this.someInfo = someInfo;
}
}
-----------
public class TestResult extends TestAbstractResult
{
private String one;
public String getOne()
{
return one;
}
public void setOne(String one)
{
this.one = one;
}
}
-----------
This is mapped to the following WSDL types (when accessed through HTTP
GET ?wsdl):
<types>
<schema targetNamespace="http://degenring.de";
xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";>
<complexType name="TestResult">
<complexContent>
<extension base="tns1:TestAbstractResult">
<sequence>
<element name="one" nillable="true" type="xsd:string" />
!!!! <element name="someInfo" nillable="true" type="xsd:string" />
!!!!
</sequence>
</extension>
</complexContent>
</complexType>
<complexType name="TestAbstractResult">
<sequence>
<element name="someInfo" nillable="true" type="xsd:string" />
</sequence>
</complexType>
<element name="TestResult" nillable="true" type="tns1:TestResult" />
</schema>
</types>
The "someInfo" element is in the complexType "TestAbstractResult" *and*
in the complexType "TestResult", which inherits from TestAbstractResult.
So the "someInfo" element is twice in "TestResult": Once inherited from
TestAbstractResult, and one defined in TestResult. I think the line
marked with "!!!!" is too much. Do you agree?
Arne
