I tried this with just my class compiled with -g and it worked great. I assume the --implClass option is provided if you don't want to go to the trouble of compiling a special debug-version of your class in your usual place.
i.e., I set up a 'wsdl' target in ant but I rip out my standard build tree first to insure I get a good -g compile, compile -g, build the wsdl file (w/o --implClass), and finally rip out the tree again (so next time build clean optimized version of the class files). Of course there are cleaner ways of doing all of this, but I can image why the --implClass option is provided. Heitzso On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 18:22, Naresh Bhatia wrote: > - But isn't Java2WSDL supposed to generate the implementation class? > > - Can't Java2WSDL pick the parameter names from the class-of-portType if it > is compiled with -g? > > Thanks. > Naresh > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 10:19 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Parameters Name > > > Supply the --implClass option with a class that was compiled with -g. > > > Rich 'Shirley' Scheuerle > IBM WebSphere & Axis Web Services Development > 512-838-5115 (IBM TL 678-5115) > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 06/25/2002 07:33 AM > Please respond to axis-user > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > cc: > Subject: Parameters Name > > > > Hi, > > When i use Java2WSDL, it replaces methods parameters name with in0, in1 > and so > on... > Is it possible to keep original parameters names ? I need the meaning > included > in their original name. > > Thx for any help about this. > > Cedric > >
