I only know the one in the AXIS documentation, which is not really much...
----- Original Message ----- From: "Deepth Dinesan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 1:44 PM Subject: Re: Serializer/Deserializer > Hi Sorin, > > In fact am trying to convert an exising RMI Server to emit SOAP messages. > [ Convert Java Serialization to SOAP Serialization ] > > Some of these classes are immutable and already define ObjectStreamFields[] > ,readObject(), and writeObject() for Java Object Serialization . Am wondering > why couldnt these be reused rather than defining a set of > serializers/deserializers which does the same . > > Probably I need to look deep inside and see how reflection is being done in axis > . > Are there any docs on typeMapping ? > > ThanX > Deepth > > > > > Sorin Pop wrote: > > > I guess you could use the builtin bean (de)serializer, that is, tha > > beanmapping tag in the deploy.wsdd file. > > > > Theoretically you will be able to serialize all the public members of your > > types and you don't have to write custom (de)serializers. I have been > > experiencing with the same issue the last few days, and for me it works, > > true, I tried it with a quite simplistic scenario. I don't know how your > > types look like, though. The only problem I encountered so far was that if I > > had a type X wich had a member array of Y objects, then it didn't work > > unless a wrote a getter/setter method pair for the Y[] member. > > > > Here is the letter I sent on this mailing list a few days ago, nobody really > > replied to it until now: > > > > Hi, > > > > allegedly AXIS 1.0rc can handle the (de)serialization of custom objects with > > the builtin bean (de)serializer classes (beanmapping tag in the WSDD), and > > these custom objects don't necessarily need to have getter/setter methods > > anymore, it's enough for the (serializable) members to be declared public. > > > > I tried it out, and it looks like it works, only to a certain point though: > > when the custom object contains a public member which is an array of another > > custom object. Then AXIS can handle the (de)serialization of the big object > > only if I write, like before, a custom (de)serializer class for it (and I > > have a typemapping tag in the deploy.wsdd file for the big object). If I use > > the beanmapping tag for it, then I get the following error messages (lets > > say the big class is called X, the little one Y, so X contains an array of > > Ys, which is called y_array): > > > > java.lang.IllegalArgument Exception: array element type mismatch > > Could not convert [LY; to bean field y_array[0], type Y > > > > I don't know where that [L in front of the class name comes from, maybe the > > problem is related to that... > > I have checked the SOAP message AXIS gets from the client, and I haven't > > seen anything unusual in it. When I comment out the beanmapping tag and > > uncover the typemapping tag for the X (yes, X, not Y, Y has a beanmapping > > tag) class in the WSDD (which points to the custom (de)serializer classes), > > and I redeploy the web service, then it works again. > > > > Has anybody encountered this problem? Any suggestions? > > > > Thanks. > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Deepth Dinesan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2002 11:15 AM > > Subject: Serializer/Deserializer > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I have some (about 25) user defined types that I need to serialize . > > > These classses > > > are fairly complex making use of inheritance and aggregation > > > extensively . > > > Is there a way by which I can avoid writing serializers/deserializers > > > and still be able to serialize . > > > > > > Eg: > > > > > > (1) I may use the ObjectStreamFields and the transient keyword to find > > > which fields needs to be serialized !! > > > (2) I can have a java2schema generator. and then I may defines a map > > > file which axis may use to serialize/deserialize . In fact this approach > > > is being used by MindElectric in thei GLUE product . Pretty Clean way !! > > > > > > ThanX > > > Deepth > > > > > > > > > -- > > > "You have Brains in Your Head,You have feet in your Shoes" > > > "You can steer yourself any direction you choose" > > > > > > > > -- > "You have Brains in Your Head,You have feet in your Shoes" > "You can steer yourself any direction you choose" > >
