I find Axis easier to use, but not necessarily better documented or less
buggy. JWSDP works fine for me. The trick is getting a good Ant
build file. I have one that works fine with JWSDP 1.1, but I haven't
updated it to work with JWSDP 1.2 yet.
I can't answer you questions about doc/lit in Axis. That seems to
be an area where people want more documentation based on the steady stream of
questions about it on this mailing list. The common answer seems to be
"look at the example code", but apparently that isn't enough because the
questions just keep coming.
-----Original Message-----
From: Mark D. Hansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 8:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: need an alternative to Sun's JAX-RPC RI in JWSDP 1.2Thanks for responding.I'd like to know:(1) Generally speaking, do you find AXIS easier to use, better documented, and less buggy than JWSDP?(2) Specifically, I'm trying to use JAX-RPC as a platform to develop a simple messaging framework. JAXM would actually be better suited to my purposes, but I can't use JAXM because I need to use official J2EE technology. I discovered that the current JAXRPC RI doesn't support dynamic proxy for oneway doc/lit - so it can't be used to develop my messaging framework. Does AXIS 1.1 support dynamic proxy for oneway doc/lit?-----Original Message-----
From: Volkmann, Mark [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2003 9:15 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: need an alternative to Sun's JAX-RPC RI in JWSDP 1.2I have worked with both Axis and JWSDP. What do you want to know?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark D. Hansen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2003 8:44 PM
> To: AXIS Users (E-mail 2)
> Subject: need an alternative to Sun's JAX-RPC RI in JWSDP 1.2
>
>
> I'm pulling my hair out trying to work with Sun's JAX-RPC RI
> - particularly the wscompile tool. Am I just dense or is it
> hard to work with?
>
> Will I be any happier switching over to Axis? Has anybody on
> this list worked with both?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark
>
***********************************************************************************
WARNING: All e-mail sent to and from this address will be received or
otherwise recorded by the A.G. Edwards corporate e-mail system and is
subject to archival, monitoring or review by, and/or disclosure to,
someone other than the recipient.
************************************************************************************
