Could you clarify why you don't think attributes such as xsi:type should be
valid in doc/lit.
Suppose your document is described by
<element foo type='bar'/>
<complexType name="bar" abstract="true">
...
</complexType>
<complexType name="bar1"
<extension base="bar">
...
</extension>
</complexType>
... other types derived from bar ...
Then you might have a document
<foo xsi:type="bar1">...</foo>
where the xsi:type told which derived type was being used.
Jeff
----- Original Message -----
From: "Cory Wilkerson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 8:33 AM
Subject: RE: WRAPPED services without wsdl
I guess my question is -- is xsi still valid in a doc/lit operation? It
doesn't seem like it would be.
