RE: WSDL SchemaDTD

[Mark.Gargan]

Title: Message

Thanks for clearing that up Anne. What's the story with Axis and implementing WSDL 1.2 do you know?   Thanks, Mark.   -----Original Message----- From: Anne Thomas Manes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 August 2003 21:03 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: WSDL SchemaDTD Although lots of people do put a schema behind a namespace URI, you shouldn't count on it. Even if you do find a schema at that location, you shouldn't assume that the schema is the only schema that defines names in the namespace.   It just so happens that in this circumstance the wsdl namespace URI doesin fact point to the WSDL schema.   In WSDL 1.1, one portType cannot extend another portType.   Regards, Anne ----- Original Message ----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 3:47 PM Subject: RE: WSDL SchemaDTD Richard and Girish,             Thanks lads. I was getting ahead of myself I think. I was looking at WSDL1.2 indeed Girish. Thanks for setting me straight. Richard, thanks for the URL. I've a nasty habit of thinking that namespaces don't have schemas behind them for some reason. Bit of practice will hopefully sort me out.   Thanks again folks Mark. -----Original Message----- From: Hansen, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 08 August 2003 20:24 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: WSDL SchemaDTD http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/wsdl/ -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, August 08, 2003 2:38 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: WSDL SchemaDTD Hi folks,               Is there a WSDL schema or DTD available does anyone know? I'm just having a quick look at the wsdl spec here and instead of 'portType' they have 'interface'. This is interesting as they mention that intances of the interface element may extend other interfaces. I was wondering if this was the same with portTypes? Can one portType extend the operations within another portType?   Thanks, Mark.