Dims,

done, with test project. Hope someone has time to look at it soon since
there is no easy workaround.

Yves

On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 15:21, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> please log a bug (a test would be much appreciated)
> 
> thanks,
> dims
> 
> On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 14:00:20 +0200, Yves Langisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Follow-up: I have the same behaviour when I set the handlers on the call
> > (setClientHandlers). It's already enough to invoke the method with an
> > empty chain to get the described behaviour.
> > 
> > Tested with 1.2beta1 and 1.2beta2.
> > 
> > What's wrong here?
> > 
> > Yves
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Mon, 2004-07-19 at 11:31, Yves Langisch wrote:
> > > All,
> > >
> > > I have a document/literal web service which I invoke through the
> > > wsdl2java generated stub. So far everything is okay. Now, if I create a
> > > client-config.wsdd to define some handlers, it seems that the
> > > client-config.wsdd overrides the encoding settings made by the stub
> > > although there is no encodingStyle -> call seems to be soap-encoded
> > > instead of literal afterwards. Following the client-config.wsdd:
> > >
> > > <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> > > <deployment name="defaultClientConfig"
> > >     xmlns="http://xml.apache.org/axis/wsdd/";
> > >     xmlns:java="http://xml.apache.org/axis/wsdd/providers/java";>
> > >     <transport name="http"
> > > pivot="java:org.apache.axis.transport.http.HTTPSender"/>
> > >     <transport name="local"
> > > pivot="java:org.apache.axis.transport.local.LocalSender"/>
> > >     <transport name="java"
> > > pivot="java:org.apache.axis.transport.java.JavaSender"/>
> > >     <service name="SalaryDeclaration">
> > >         <requestFlow>
> > >             <handler type="java:a.b.c.SOAPMonitorHandlerClient"/>
> > >         </requestFlow>
> > >         <responseFlow>
> > >             <handler type="java:a.b.c.SOAPMonitorHandlerClient"/>
> > >         </responseFlow>
> > >     </service>
> > > </deployment>
> > >
> > > Is this a normal behaviour?
> > >
> > > Yves
> > 
> > 

Reply via email to