RE: Strange behavior on soap message generated by axis1.1?

[egemen kalyoncu]

hi
Do you mind you could use "RPC" style in the wsdl file instead of "Document" 
style?

if you use rpc style the soap message's body part is constructed between 
your <method name> </method name> tags.


From: "Liu, Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Strange behavior on soap message generated by axis1.1?
Date: Fri, 6 Aug 2004 18:00:57 -0700
I used Axis 1.1 RC2 before I switched to the stable Axis 1.1 final
version (June 2003). Then the RESPONSE soap message in my service was
changed to an undesired form. The message looks like this.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
      <soapenv:Envelope
xmlns:soapenv="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/";
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";>
         <soapenv:Body>
            <addResponse xmlns="urn:messages.webservices">
               <AddResponse xmlns="urn:messages.webservices">
<========================= This is extra
                  <status isSuccess="true"/>
                  <ns1:recordRef key="89" type="case"
xmlns:ns1="urn:dto.webservices"/>
               </AddResponse>
<========================= This is extra
            </addResponse>
         </soapenv:Body>
      </soapenv:Envelope>


The response was defined as the follows.

            <message name="addResponse">
                        <part name="parameters"
element="types:addResponse"/>
            </message>
            <!-- Add -->
            <complexType name="AddResponse">
            <sequence>
                <element ref="msg:status"/>
                <element ref="dto:recordRef" minOccurs="0"/>
            </sequence>
            </complexType>
            <element name="addResponse" type="msg:AddResponse"/>

Why did it include the complex type "AddResponse" in the soap message?

If I switch to the old version it would be fine.

Can someone point me to the solution or the axis class which maybe
responsible for the behavior?

Thanks a bunch,

Scott

_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE* 
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail