The main thrust of my comment is that backward compat is already broken in a number of areas, so why are you worried about the enum change?
> -----Original Message----- > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 3:41 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: "JRE 1.5 "enum" is a Reserved Word" Does Axis > Comply withthis rule? > > If you want a switch for the old behavior of classes, please help... > > thanks, > dims > > > On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 18:37:48 -0500, Davanum Srinivas > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > And i belive Tom gave u an answer as well...See section 4.2.5 in > > JAX-RPC 1.1 spec. > > > > -- dims > > > > > > On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:11:56 -0800, Simon Fell > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Did so months ago. > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AXIS-1454 > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Davanum Srinivas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Sent: Monday, February 07, 2005 1:00 PM > > > > To: Simon Fell > > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Subject: Re: "JRE 1.5 "enum" is a Reserved Word" Does > Axis Comply > > > > withthis rule? > > > > > > > > Class names is for JAXRPC11 compliance...If you have specific > > > > problems with "some types", please log a bug report. > > > > > > > > -- dims > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ > > > > > -- > Davanum Srinivas - http://webservices.apache.org/~dims/ > >
