On Mon, 20 May 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> So overall the question becomes do we change passthru, or do we add some > new passthru-like operator? I'd prefer to fix passthru, as I hate to add > extra cruft, but I'm open to other thoughts on this (including ones that > say "Do nothing - it ain't broke don't fix it"). In another system, I've implemented an operator that works kinda like a "runto" value. Each rule in the pipeline definition has a numeric ID, and when the runto is set, it will execute the pipeline up to that point. For example, if you have a pipeline: 100 openoffice->xml conversion 200 transform via per-page xsl 201 transform via root xsl 300 postprocessing and you use "runto=100" in the URL, it will show you the XML after the OpenOffice conversion. You could hold on to the existing passthru to show the original openoffice file (or you could use "runto=0" instead, conceivably). --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
