Matt Sergeant wrote: > On Thu, 20 Dec 2001, Bruce Miller wrote: >>Is a month not patient enough? >> > Well, in that month we haven't put out a new release... So I'm not sure > what the gripe is about. Your patches, or if they're not "right" then > alternate patches, will go in the next release along with better tests. That's fine. My "gripe" was not seeing any direct response (eg. associated CVS activity, or "It's on the TODO list", or whatever); it appeared to be ignored. My application (and it's users :>) pretty much _requires_ the validation (and why it fails). I was just hoping feedback to the effect that the capability (or equivalent) would show up in the near future; otherwise, I'd need to change strategy, which I didn't want to do. I _certainly_ didn't expect you to immediately rush a new release out! >>I like the project and people too much to walk, but.... >> > I'm a busy and tired guy. Indeed; moving & remodelling takes a surprisingly long time to recover from! :> Part of the misunderstanding was that you're generally _very_ responsive to comments/questions/whatever on these lists. So, I ass-u-me-d that since you hadn't responded, you weren't interested. > See http://use.perl/org/~matts/journal for http://use.perl.org/~matts/journal > details. But it's Christmas, and I have a few days off, so I'll try and > get on to it. That and AxKit 1.5. And moving to apache.org. And SAX stuff. > And PDFLib updates. And OSCon proposals. And somewhere in there I have to > walk the dogs :-) Well, dogs have a very effective way of getting your attention! Thanks for the response! --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
