On Monday 21 January 2002 17:33, Tod Harter wrote: > Isn't the answer then to NOT have the PI in the original data? I mean if > you sometimes need it and sometimes don't then the stylesheet isn't really > PART of the document [...] > PI's in documents should only be present when they are ALWAYS relevant.
I'm afraid you have misunderstood what PIs are for. They are "Processing Instructions". That is, instructions given to processors that recognize them. There is nothing that says that a processor (in this case AxKit) _must_ act upon PIs that it recognizes. In fact, it is not infrequent at all that depending on configuration options a processor will only act upon those that it was told to. Perhaps the AxProcessPI (or whatever) option should take a mask ? That way one could configure it to accept xslt but not css and so forth. -- _______________________________________________________________________ Robin Berjon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- CTO k n o w s c a p e : // venture knowledge agency www.knowscape.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------- James Joyce -- an essentially private man who wished his total indifference to public notice to be universally recognized. -- Tom Stoppard --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
