Am Monday, 22. September 2003 17:43, schrieb Tod Harter: > On Sunday 21 September 2003 10:36 am, Jörg Walter wrote: > > Exactly, AxKit parses the file as file. AxKit doesn't execute CGI's. > > Using axkit:// URLs, you can execute other AxKit pages and include the > > results, but I think this won't work with CGI. You may try > > http://localhost/gcgi/left.cgi instead, which will ask your apache via > > HTTP. > > Its not a matter of AXKIT executing a CGI, its a relative URL, so presuming > the base points to a server where the URL is valid then the results of CGI > execution SHOULD be returned, thats only plain sense...
Sorry, but this is nonsense - doubly so. First, "the base" as you call it is only vaguely defined. If you define it in the 'xml:base' sense, then AxKit is 100% correct - within the processing pipeline, the base is a file path, not a http URL - we are inside a server side framework, not inside the browser. Second, even if the base was an URL, CGI's need not be executed. It is up to the http server to do with the CGI's whatever it likes. You cannot point to some resource via http and tell "please deliver the file executed as CGI". -- CU Joerg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
