I actually agree. Which word ought we to use instead, to describe the ease of understanding that a user has when interacting in a way that is familiar through learned experience?
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 3:57 AM, Thorsten Wilms <t...@freenet.de> wrote: > On Fri, 2010-05-14 at 11:37 +0200, Jan-Christoph Borchardt wrote: > > > That is exactly why interaction needs to be intuitive and not require > learning. > > This is totally unrealistic. Humans can't even walk or talk without > learning. > > Some say the nipple would be the only intuitive interface. I've been > told that not even breast feeding just works on first try ... > > Also see: > http://www.uie.com/articles/design_intuitive/ > > The thing that makes people think something would be "intuitive" is > actually familiarity. It might be useful to think of familiarity coming > from 3 sources: > * Physical, real world experience that can be leveraged with metaphors > and pseudo-physical interface elements (or perhaps custom interface > hardware). > * Experience with existing software. > * Concepts/thought-models from specific fields. > > I think the term "intuitive" should be avoided, banned even, from > further discussion. It's a symptom of a lack of understanding in this > field. > > > -- > Thorsten Wilms > > thorwil's design for free software: > http://thorwil.wordpress.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana > Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net > Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana > More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
