Just a quick update on the revamped dash mockup: http://i.imgur.com/mLzuI.jpg
I had forgot to add the lens titles but now it's done. 2011/5/30 Niklas Rosenqvist <niklas.s.rosenqv...@gmail.com> > 2011/5/30 Henrik Peytz <henrik.pe...@gmail.com> > >> I agree on all points, especially the frustration of not being able to >> remove the global menu/top panel. >> >> Still though, wouldn't something like what I proposed earlier >> http://fav.me/d3h14i1 (disregard everything but the traybar in top-right >> corner) work? > > > Like elementary's wingpanel you mean? ( > http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2010/12/wingpanel-elementarys-slick-new-space-saving-panel/ > ) > > The problem with that would be that it would be counter productive to what > we try to achieve with removing the global menu/top panel. By removing it > applications could utilize the title bar much more effective: > http://i.imgur.com/g6MWM.png > > When we don't take up more than one screen edge with the OS interface third > party applications can create much more effective applications and really > design with Fitt's law in mind. > > > 2011/5/30 Henrik Peytz <henrik.pe...@gmail.com> > >> I agree on all points, especially the frustration of not being able to >> remove the global menu/top panel. >> >> Still though, wouldn't something like what I proposed earlier >> http://fav.me/d3h14i1 (disregard everything but the traybar in top-right >> corner) work? >> >> Last I checked, Gnome supported multiple resizable panels. Wouldn't it be >> a simple matter of defining "this autoscaling, always-on-top panel goes in >> the the top-right corner and holds all the tray-icons per default"? As far >> as I see it doesn't violate the standard convention of how tray-icons work, >> while at the same time allowing for removal of the rest of the panel. >> >> 2011/5/29 Ed Lin <edlin...@gmail.com> >> >>> On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 7:41 PM, Niklas Rosenqvist >>> <niklas.s.rosenqv...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > Ok, should I post these in ayatana-design or should I be more specific? >>> > >>> The Expose thing is compiz, most of the other points concern the >>> launcher so I'd fill them under Unity. Actually I'm not really sure >>> what ayatana-design should be used for at all. >>> The ubuntu welcome center needs a different approach, maybe that's >>> what aytana is for? It's not a needs packaging because it doesn't >>> exist, it's not a part of core Unity either. It's more of a high level >>> design/usability goal. >>> >>> PPA could be filled under ayatana too or directly under "ubuntu", it's >>> nothing that concerns a single package but is an >>> infrastructure/management issue. >>> >>> But I'm no expert on these matters... >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana >>> Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net >>> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana >>> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana >> Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net >> Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana >> More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ayatana Post to : ayatana@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ayatana More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp