On Friday 23 January 2009 01:26:18 Sven Eckelmann wrote: [...] > Hm, sounds interesting, but I see different problems. First thing is the > different copyright. You specified GPL2 for the batman(-adv) documentation > and Wesley released his stuff as CC-by-nc-sa-3.0. These licenses aren't > compatible in the way that you relicense his work under the GPL2 [2], but > you can ask him if he relicenses his work. Ok, I asked him and he agreed.
> The second thing is that somebody has to rewrite it into XML Docbook. This
> isn't that bad but I will definitely not doing anything like that until
> somebody explained me why you are using a SGML Docbook tool to convert a
> XML docbook to your target format. When you try it on another distribution
> than debian etch/lenny you will propably receive an error (try for example
> one of our public accessible machines at tuc).
Pushed fix in a clone of your git repo and requested merge.
> And maybe somebody can answer the question what is the right way to do the
> conversation job? I found different references that their is/was some xsl
> stylesheet to convert them to pdf but I don't want to fiddle about xsltproc
> and different xsl paths on each plattform. I tried xmlto some time ago
> (small shell script which does all the xslt stuff for me), but the output
> was quite bad and it had problems with the images (hm, reminds me on the
> fact that the current way the images are handled inside batman-adv-doc is a
> hack too).
Seems to be better now. xmlto with fo output +fop isn't that bad. Their are
problems with images when you try to generate pdf directly but generating ps
and then pdf works fine. I read that renderx xep works better, but it is a
commercial tool.
Regards,
Sven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
