Hello Andrew,

no, sorry, and i won't be able to do it this week as i am at the cebit
this whole week (if anyone else is there, please tell me. ;).

I would therefore like to ask you and Linus to test it as well, i will 
perform more tests on sunday.

Thanks,
        Simon

On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 07:43:08AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 01, 2010 at 05:57:06PM +0100, Simon Wunderlich wrote:
> > Hey Andrew,
> > 
> > all list-adds and list-removes do a kref_get or kref_put respectively,
> > but that probably was not very clear. As soon as a refence is created 
> > (by linking into the hash or a list), we should also kref_get() it.
> > 
> > Please find attached a new version of this patch with separate 
> > send_list_add/remove functions which include the put/get functions. 
> > I've also added the kref_put/get call to the send_list loop again.
> > It should look more balanced now. Tested in my 9 qemu setup again,
> > no memory leaks or crashes but i only did a very quick test 
> > (15 minutes)
> 
> Hi Simon
> 
> This looks better. Did it survive longer testing? 
> 
>      Andrew
> 

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to