Marek Lindner wrote: > On Saturday 14 August 2010 23:08:05 Sven Eckelmann wrote: > > The user usually sets a mtu by hand and don't want to have software to > > change it automatically. This is only needed when we must reduce the mtu > > due to a low mtu of an active slave device, but we should not increase > > it when any other action is made on the system related to the used > > interfaces. > > I fear that this might lead to a strange user experience. If the mtu on > batX wasn't set explicitely but the mtu of an interface used by batman is > increased while batman uses it the user has to know that he/she now needs > to manually modify the batX mtu before it becomes effective. > > What about a flag which remembers whether the mtu on batX was modified by > the user. If so, batman-adv does not increase the mtu otherwise we keep > the current behaviour ?
Ok, then drop that patch. The user seems to be familiar with that behavior
because bridge handles it the same way.
Best regards,
Sven
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
