On Thursday 20 January 2011 12:01:14 Marek Lindner wrote:
> As the table states 2010.2.0 got version 13 but trunk & next are on 12. I
> made a diff between the packet.h files and saw the gateway flags,
> therefore I proposed to increase the version number to 14. Should the next
> release contain a version smaller than the previous release ?

If you promise that we won't have a feature in trunk but not in next for 
ages... Personally I don't see the reason to make a fully compatible version 
incompatible. And I don't want to explain David S. Miller why he has to merge 
such a change (and the merge window is closed now).

Best regards,
        Sven

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply via email to