I have not tested that deeply but some people told me that their computer (HNA) is missing on the graf...
2011/7/12 Linus Lüssing <[email protected]>: > On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 12:27:28AM +0200, Sven Eckelmann wrote: >> On Tuesday 05 July 2011 23:29:07 Gioacchino Mazzurco wrote: >> > Good job, but what we are trying to fix is the topology visualization >> > we need that at moment >> >> Just looked with one eye at the stuff and it seems that the data which comes >> from the kernel module is not what you expect. For example 00:15:6d:fc:72:0b >> isn't marked as primary or secondary. > > We don't mark secondary interfaces explicitly in the raw output, a > raw row output of a primary interface contains all the > information, both that it is a primary interface and also > optionally which other secondary interfaces belong to it. > > Gioacchino: > Are the interfaces 00:15:6d:fc:72:0b, 06:15:6d:7c:09:d8 and > 06:15:6d:fc:71:ce primary or secondary ones? > (a primary one is the one listed in the first line of 'batctl o', > the MainIf) > > And those are actually the specific ones where no > subgraph-dot-thingy has been added and no box was drawn and where > the error lies, right? Or are there more issues we missed so far > (like links, HNA entries or interfaces missing completely in the list and/or > graph for instance)? > >> >> It looks like one vis_if_list >> >> So you can't use the module from 2.6.38 and expect that we fix it with >> batctl. >> And the correct people to ask here are: >> * Simon Wunderlich (author of the vis stuff) >> * Linus Luessing (the person which added the subgraph stuff) >> * Andrew Lunn (he introduced the format "vis raw" which is used in vis_data) >> >> I don't want to touch it because it may explode in my hand. But you can also >> try whether you are lucky and check vis_seq_print_text. It is currently >> overly >> complex without any reason. It could easily use seq_file and don't do the >> precalculation (which was necessary in /sys).... I forgot the topic. >> >> Kind regards, >> Sven >
